Due to the nature of team projects and their workflows, it is probable that no two team workflows will be identical. Consequently, each team project will necessitate a unique mapping, as illustrated in the simple example in Figure 1.
It is possible that team projects are similar if not identical. Figure 2 combines the workflows of two different team projects (TEAM & TEST). This approach is valid and will yield a correct result. However, it will lead to a loss of detail and insight for the TEST project, as all In Development, Ready for QA, and In Test data will be merged into an In Progress value. The recommended strategy is to establish distinct one-to-one mappings for each project.
Next:
Cards extension